Privacy Policy Directory
Browse and compare privacy policies from hundreds of companies. Filter by category, sort by privacy score, and find detailed analysis of data protection practices.

Starbucks
starbucks.com
Starbucks' policies are comprehensive but have critical issues like broad data sharing and forced arbitration, affecting user rights and clarity.

Cond� Nast Publications
bonappetit.com
Condé Nast's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and clarity.

Pinchofyum
pinchofyum.com
The policy is comprehensive with clear data practices and user rights but has concerns regarding retention, sharing, and dispute resolution.

Allrecipes
allrecipes.com
Dotdash Meredith's policies are detailed but lack clarity and have broad data sharing practices, affecting user trust and understanding.

Coca-Cola
coca-cola.com
Coca-Cola's privacy policy and terms of service provide a robust framework with detailed data practices and user rights, but fall short in clarity and legal fairness, particularly regarding arbitration and data retention.

Hearst Communications
delish.com
Hearst's privacy policy and TOS are comprehensive but have areas for improvement in data retention transparency and user rights processes.

Just One Cookbook
justonecookbook.com
Just One Cookbook's policies are clear and comply with major regulations but have weaknesses in security, data sharing, and user rights.

Saveur
saveur.com
SAVEUR's policies are detailed but have critical issues like binding arbitration and broad data sharing, impacting user rights and legal protection.

Thrillist
thrillist.com
Vox Media's policies are comprehensive but lack transparency in data sharing and security, with concerning legal clauses limiting user recourse.

Zomato Media
zomato.com
Zomato's policies are comprehensive but lack transparency in data sharing and use complex language, affecting user understanding and rights.

Television Food Network, G.P.
foodnetwork.com
Warner Bros. Discovery's policies show some transparency but have significant gaps in data practices, user rights, and legal fairness, warranting a score of 68/100.

Food & Wine
foodandwine.com
The policy and terms are detailed but lack clarity and have one-sided legal terms, affecting user trust and understanding.