Educational Resource Privacy Policies

Tuta

tuta.com

92

Tutao GmbH excels in data privacy and user rights with clear policies, though minor clarity improvements are needed.

arXiv

arxiv.org

92

arXiv's privacy policy is robust with strong user rights and clear language, though it could improve in data sharing and retention details.

Proquest

proquest.com

85

ProQuest excels in data privacy and user rights but needs clarity and legal fairness improvements.

Springer

springer.com

83

Springer Nature's policies are robust with GDPR compliance and clear user rights but have areas needing improvement like vague data usage and dispute resolution.

TheFreeDictionary

thefreedictionary.com

83

Farlex's privacy policy and terms of use have some strengths, but also several weaknesses and unusual elements that impact the overall score.

Articulate

articulate.com

82

Articulate's policies are robust with strong data practices and user rights but have areas for improvement in clarity and legal fairness.

Askubuntu

askubuntu.com

82

Stack Overflow's policies are robust in data privacy and security but lack clarity in data retention and sharing practices, with concerning legal terms limiting user recourse.

Bible.com Inc

bible.com

82

YouVersion excels in data protection and user rights but needs clearer retention policies and stricter third-party sharing limits.

Coursera

coursera.org

82

Coursera's policies are robust with strong privacy and user rights, but clarity and legal protections could be improved.

De Gruyter

degruyter.com

82

De Gruyter's policies are comprehensive with strong user rights and clear language but lack detailed security measures and have some retention issues.

Exceedlms

exceedlms.com

82

Intellum's policies are robust but lack clarity in retention and dispute resolution.

Fourhourworkweek

fourhourworkweek.com

82

The policy is comprehensive with clear data practices and user rights but lacks in security transparency and control over blockchain data.