Privacy Policy Directory

Waymo

waymo.com

81

Waymo's policies are transparent but lack specific retention periods and security details, with some one-sided legal terms.

Ars Technica

arstechnica.com

80

Condé Nast's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and legal terms, scoring 80/100.

Future Com Ltd

futurism.com

78

Recurrent Ventures' policies are comprehensive but have notable gaps in data retention clarity and user rights, along with concerning legal terms.

Takeda Pharmaceuticals

takeda.com

78

Takeda's privacy policy is robust with clear data practices but has gaps in security and legal protections.

Gizmodo

gizmodo.com

76

Gizmodo's privacy policy and terms of service provide a solid foundation with clear data practices and user rights but have areas for improvement in transparency, user control, and legal fairness.

Contagious

contagious.com

72

Ascential's policy is strong in security and user rights but lacks transparency in data practices and has concerning legal terms.

Foundry

cio.com

72

IDG's policy is compliant but lacks clarity and has broad sharing practices.

InfoWorld

infoworld.com

72

The policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in user rights and legal fairness, scoring 72 out of 100.

Nokia

nokia.com

72

Nokia's privacy policy is comprehensive but has areas for improvement in clarity, specificity, and user rights.

TechTarget Inc

techtarget.com

72

TechTarget's privacy policy is comprehensive but has critical issues like data selling and broad sharing, while terms of service lack clarity and have problematic clauses.

GeekWire

geekwire.com

65

The policies provide a good foundation but have notable gaps in data privacy, legal protection, and clarity, which could be improved to better protect users.

Weburbanist

weburbanist.com

42

WebUrbanist's policies are outdated and lack transparency in data practices and user rights, scoring 42 out of 100.