Privacy Policy Directory
Browse and compare privacy policies from hundreds of companies. Filter by category, sort by privacy score, and find detailed analysis of data protection practices.
TechRadar Pro
techradar.com
Future plc's privacy policy and terms are robust with strong data practices and user rights, though clarity and security details could be enhanced.
WIRED
wired.com
Condé Nast's privacy policy and terms of service provide a robust framework but have notable weaknesses in data sharing and legal protections, scoring 82 out of 100.
Ars Technica
arstechnica.com
Condé Nast's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and legal terms, scoring 80/100.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd
dji.com
DJI's policy is comprehensive but could improve in clarity and specificity, especially in security and data retention.
Makeuseof
makeuseof.com
Valnet's policies are robust in security and user rights but lack in data sharing transparency and dispute resolution fairness.
Xiaomi
xiaomi.com
Xiaomi's privacy policy is robust in security and user rights but lacks transparency in data collection and clarity.
Gizmodo
gizmodo.com
Gizmodo's privacy policy and terms of service provide a solid foundation with clear data practices and user rights but have areas for improvement in transparency, user control, and legal fairness.
Maketecheasier
maketecheasier.com
MakeTechEasier's policies are comprehensive but have areas needing improvement in data privacy and user rights.
9to5mac.com
9to5mac.com
The policies show strengths in data privacy and legal enforcement but lack clarity and have critical issues like frequent breaches and poor user control.
MIT's Technology Review Magazine
technologyreview.com
MIT Technology Review's policies are comprehensive but have areas for improvement in data sharing and legal fairness.
PCMAG.com
pcmag.com
Ziff Davis demonstrates strengths in data transparency and user rights but falls short in security clarity and user-friendly policies.
CNET
cnet.com
Ziff Davis demonstrates some strengths in data privacy and user rights but falls short in transparency, user control, and legal fairness, warranting a score of 65 out of 100.