Privacy Policy Directory

Flipsnack

flipsnack.com

88

Flipsnack demonstrates strong privacy practices with comprehensive user rights, though clarity and legal fairness could be improved.

GitBook

gitbook.com

82

GitBook's policies are robust in data privacy and user rights but have some gaps in clarity and legal fairness.

Mohitseb

mohitseb.com

82

Google's privacy policy and terms of service demonstrate strong data privacy practices and user controls but have areas for improvement in clarity and legal fairness.

Smashing Magazine

smashingmagazine.com

82

A comprehensive policy with clear strengths in user rights and clarity, but needing more specificity in data practices and security.

WordPress.com

wordpress.com

82

Automattic's privacy policy and terms of service demonstrate strong transparency and user control but have areas for improvement in data sharing and legal protections.

FlipHTML5 Software Co. Ltd

fliphtml5.com

78

FlipHTML5's policies are mostly transparent but lack clarity in data retention and user consent, with broad termination rights.

Bepress

bepress.com

72

Elsevier's policy is transparent in data practices but lacks in user control and legal fairness, scoring 72/100.

StudioPress

studiopress.com

72

WP Engine's policies provide a foundation for privacy and legal standards but fall short in transparency, user control, and clarity, particularly in security and liability terms.

Nxtbook

nxtbook.com

65

Nxtbook Media's policy has clear data practices but lacks in retention details and user rights, scoring 65/100.

SnapWidget

snapwidget.com

65

SnapWidget's policies have strengths in transparency but lack specificity and clarity in key areas, leading to a moderate score of 65.

Buffer

buffer.com

60

Buffer's privacy policy and terms of service agreement are clear and concise, but could be improved by providing clear information about the types of data they collect and how they use it.