Home Furnishings Privacy Policies
Companies in the Home Furnishings category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 50 companies in the Home Furnishings category.

Better Homes & Gardens
bhg.com
The policies have detailed data practices but lack clarity and have broad legal terms, affecting user protection and understanding.

Domcop
domcop.com
DomCop's policies show good data privacy efforts but lack in user control and legal fairness, scoring 65/100.

Herman Miller
hermanmiller.com
MillerKnoll's policies have strengths in data transparency and user rights but lack clarity and have concerning legal terms.

Housebeautiful
housebeautiful.com
Hearst's policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and legal protections, impacting user rights and clarity.

Overstock.com
overstock.com
Beyond's policy is comprehensive but has significant clarity and user rights issues, particularly with mandatory arbitration and complex language.

Southern Living
southernliving.com
The policy and terms are comprehensive but lack clarity and user control, with broad data sharing and legal protections that may not fully safeguard users.

TP-LINK
tp-link.com
TP-Link's policies have strengths in data security and user rights but fall short in clarity and specificity, with concerning elements like perpetual content licensing and broad data sharing.

Lsuagcenter
lsuagcenter.com
The policy is clear on data usage and security but lacks transparency in data retention and user rights, scoring 62/100.

Meijer
meijer.com
Meijer's policy is clear but lacks transparency in data practices and user rights, scoring 62/100.

Move, Inc
realtor.com
Move's policies have some strengths but fall short in clarity, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 62/100.

Schlage Lock Company LLC
schlage.com
Allegion's policy is somewhat transparent but lacks details on data types, security, and user rights, with complex language and one-sided terms.

Youradchoices
youradchoices.com
The DAA's policies have some strengths but fall short in security, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 62/100.