Gaming Platform Privacy Policies
Companies in the Gaming Platform category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 45 companies in the Gaming Platform category.
GameRant.com (aka Game Rant)
gamerant.com
Valnet's policies are comprehensive but have clarity and user rights issues, scoring 68/100.
Gameserrors
gameserrors.com
GamesErrors.Com has some strong privacy practices but lacks clarity and legal protections, scoring 67/100.
CNET
cnet.com
Ziff Davis demonstrates some strengths in data privacy and user rights but falls short in transparency, user control, and legal fairness, warranting a score of 65 out of 100.
Pcgamer
pcgamer.com
The policy provides detailed data practices and user rights but lacks clarity and has broad data sharing, impacting user trust and understanding.
Thegamer
thegamer.com
Valnet's policies have strengths in security and third-party transparency but lack clarity and specific user rights processes.
Macrumors
macrumors.com
MacRumors' policy is clear but lacks specifics in data practices and user rights, scoring 64/100.
Playstation
playstation.com
PlayStation's policies are comprehensive but have significant issues like vague security, broad data sharing, and legal clauses favoring the company, impacting user rights and clarity.
Androidpolice
androidpolice.com
Valnet's policies have strengths in data collection transparency and security but fall short in data sharing, retention, and user rights, impacting overall trust and compliance.
Xbox
xbox.com
Microsoft's policies have strengths in ad management but lack clarity and specificity in data practices and user rights.
Youradchoices
youradchoices.com
The DAA's policies have some strengths but fall short in security, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 62/100.
Slashgear
slashgear.com
Static Media's Privacy Policy has strengths in limited data collection and legal compliance but lacks in security and clarity, leading to a moderate score of 62.