Gaming Platform Privacy Policies

Companies in the Gaming Platform category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 42 companies in the Gaming Platform category.

AnandTech logo

AnandTech

anandtech.com

76

Future's privacy practices are robust with GDPR compliance and clear user rights, but improvements are needed in retention clarity, legal balance, and accessibility.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
Gizmodo logo

Gizmodo

gizmodo.com

76

Gizmodo's privacy policy and terms of service provide a solid foundation with clear data practices and user rights but have areas for improvement in transparency, user control, and legal fairness.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
Tom's Hardware logo

Tom's Hardware

tomshardware.com

75

The policy is comprehensive but lacks clarity in retention periods and has broad data sharing practices.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
9to5mac.com logo

9to5mac.com

9to5mac.com

72

The policies show strengths in data privacy and legal enforcement but lack clarity and have critical issues like frequent breaches and poor user control.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
Activision logo

Activision

activision.com

72

Activision's policies are comprehensive but have notable issues like indefinite data retention and binding arbitration, impacting user rights and clarity.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
Bet logo

Bet

bet.com

72

Paramount's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and user rights processes, while the terms of service raise concerns with mandatory arbitration.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
GameSpot logo

GameSpot

gamespot.com

72

Fandom's privacy policy and terms of service provide detailed disclosures but have critical issues like mandatory arbitration, broad data sharing, and complex language that may hinder user understanding and rights.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
GameStop Corp. logo

GameStop Corp.

gamestop.com

72

GameStop's privacy policy and terms of service are comprehensive but lack transparency in key areas, affecting user control and clarity.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
Red Ventures logo

Red Ventures

zdnet.com

72

Ziff Davis demonstrates a solid approach to privacy with detailed data practices but falls short in security transparency and user rights universality. Legal terms, while balanced, include restrictive arbitration clauses, and the policies' complexity hinders clarity.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
Rovio company logo

Rovio company

rovio.com

72

Rovio's policies are transparent but have notable issues like binding arbitration and broad data sharing, affecting user rights and legal protections.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-03
King logo

King

king.com

72

King's Privacy Policy and Terms of Service are detailed and legally compliant but have areas for improvement in user rights accessibility and clarity.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-02
Makezine logo

Makezine

makezine.com

72

Make Community's policies are comprehensive but lack clarity and detail in security and data retention, scoring 72/100.

Gaming Platform
Last Analysis: 2025-02-02
Showing 12 of 35 results
Previous Page 2 of 3 Next