Entertainment News Privacy Policies
Companies in the Entertainment News category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 199 companies in the Entertainment News category.

National Post
nationalpost.com
Postmedia's policies provide some transparency but have significant privacy and legal concerns, particularly around data sharing and user rights.

Noticiasaominuto
noticiasaominuto.com
The policy has strengths in consent and data minimization but lacks in security specifics and user rights processes.

Odditycentral
odditycentral.com
The policy is clear on data practices but lacks specificity in retention and user rights, affecting overall transparency and user control.

Pcgamer
pcgamer.com
The policy provides detailed data practices and user rights but lacks clarity and has broad data sharing, impacting user trust and understanding.

Playbill
playbill.com
Playbill's privacy policy is clear but lacks specifics in data retention and dispute resolution, affecting user control and legal fairness.

Pornhub
pornhub.com
Pornhub's policies show strengths in data privacy and user rights but have weaknesses in data sharing and dispute resolution, impacting overall trust and transparency.

Sky Sports
skysports.com
Sky's policy is comprehensive but lacks in user control and clarity, scoring 65/100.

Sltrib
sltrib.com
The Salt Lake Tribune's policies have some strengths but lack transparency and fairness, particularly in data sharing and legal protections.

The Ashley Madison Agency Limited
madison.com
The policy provides detailed data practices but falls short in clarity and legal fairness, particularly due to mandatory arbitration and broad data sharing.

The Guardian
theguardian.com
The Guardian's Terms of Service are comprehensive but lack transparency in data practices and fall short in user control mechanisms, scoring 65 out of 100.

Thegamer
thegamer.com
Valnet's policies have strengths in security and third-party transparency but lack clarity and specific user rights processes.

USA Today
usatoday.com
Gannett's policy has strengths in user rights and legal protections but falls short in data practices and clarity, with critical issues in broad data sharing and legal limitations.