Cloud Computing Privacy Policies
Companies in the Cloud Computing category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 79 companies in the Cloud Computing category.
Ansible
ansible.com
Red Hat's privacy policy is comprehensive but lacks clarity and specificity in key areas, affecting user understanding and control.
Apollo GraphQL
apollographql.com
Apollo's privacy policy and terms of service are comprehensive but overly complex, with notable concerns around user content licensing.
Appsheet
appsheet.com
Google's privacy policy is comprehensive but lacks clarity in retention periods and data sharing, while AppSheet's terms are balanced but have some one-sided clauses.
Bitly
bitly.com
Bitly's policies are comprehensive with strong security and user rights but have clarity and legal fairness issues.
BrowserStack
browserstack.com
BrowserStack's policies are robust with strong data practices and user rights but lack in clarity and have concerning legal terms.
Cisco Systems Inc
cisco.com
Cisco's privacy policy is robust with strong data practices and user rights, but has some areas for improvement in consent and data portability.
Cloudflare, Inc.
cloudflare.com
Cloudflare's Privacy Policy and Terms of Service demonstrate strong privacy protections and transparency, with clear data practices and user rights, though some areas like data sharing details and termination rights could be improved for greater user trust and clarity.
Databricks
databricks.com
Databricks' policies are transparent and comprehensive but have areas for improvement in user protection and clarity.
DreamHost
dreamhost.com
DreamHost's policies are robust but have areas needing improvement, particularly in data retention and legal balance.
google.com
Google's policies provide strong user controls and transparency but have gaps in data sharing and legal protections, impacting overall trust and clarity.
NPM
npmjs.com
npm's policy excels in transparency and user rights but falls short in data retention and legal protections.
Ngrok
ngrok.com
Ngrok's policies are comprehensive and clear but have areas for improvement in transparency and user-favorable terms.