Automotive Parts Privacy Policies
Companies in the Automotive Parts category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 20 companies in the Automotive Parts category.
Deere & Company
deere.com
John Deere's policy is robust with clear user rights and good security but lacks in data sharing control and clarity.
Waymo
waymo.com
Waymo's policies are transparent but lack specific retention periods and security details, with some one-sided legal terms.
Jdm-Car-Parts
jdm-car-parts.com
hCaptcha's policy is robust in data practices and user rights but has clarity issues and broad sharing practices.
Yamaha Corporation
yamaha.com
Yamaha's privacy policy is transparent in data collection but lacks clarity in sharing and retention, with some weaknesses in user rights and legal protections.
Sixt Rent a Car
sixt.com
Sixt's privacy policy is comprehensive but lacks in clarity and specific data handling practices, scoring 72/100.
U-Haul International
uhaul.com
U-Haul's policies are robust in data privacy and legal fairness but lack in user control and clarity, scoring 72/100.
Mvagusta
mvagusta.com
MV Agusta's policy is strong in data privacy and security but lacks in clarity and dispute resolution, scoring 72/100.
Thedrive
thedrive.com
The policy provides some clarity on data collection and usage, but falls short in several areas, including user rights and legal protection.
Kelley Blue Book
kbb.com
KBB's policies are thorough but lack in user protection and clarity, scoring 68/100 with notable weaknesses in legal fairness and data practices.
Avis
avis.com
Avis Budget Group's policies have some strengths but fall short in clarity and user protections, scoring 65/100.
Cars.com
cars.com
Cars.com's privacy policy is detailed but has weaknesses in data sharing and security. User rights are present but complex, and legal terms favor the company.
Edmunds.com Inc.
edmunds.com
Edmunds' policies have some strengths but lack clarity and fairness, with broad data sharing and legal terms that favor the company.