Academic Database Privacy Policies
Companies in the Academic Database category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 25 companies in the Academic Database category.
Molecular Diversity Preservation International
mdpi.com
MDPI's privacy policy and terms of service demonstrate a strong commitment to data protection and user rights, but some areas require improvement, such as clear data sharing practices and deletion rights.
arXiv
arxiv.org
The arXiv privacy policy provides a clear explanation of the types of personal data collected and how it is used, but could improve by providing more information on data retention and opt-out options.
Oxford University Press
oup.com
The company provides clear information about data collection and usage, but could improve by providing a complete list of all data types collected and explaining the purpose for each data type.
edX
edX.org
edX's privacy policy and terms of service are generally clear and comprehensive, but there are some areas for improvement, including data retention policy, data sharing practices, user rights, and dispute resolution process.
Mental Floss
mentalfloss.com
The policy provides a good foundation for data protection, but could be improved by providing more information on data collection and usage, user rights, and data portability.
Proquest
proquest.com
ProQuest's privacy policy and terms of use are generally clear and concise, but lack comprehensive data collection and usage disclosure, clear retention periods, and balanced liability and termination terms.
The Brookings Institution
brookings.edu
The Brookings Institution's privacy policy and terms of use provide a good foundation for data protection, but could be improved by providing more detailed information on data collection and usage, user rights, and dispute resolution procedures.
edX
edx.org
edX's privacy policy and terms of service agreement are not as clear and transparent as they could be, and the company could do more to explain its data collection and usage practices, user rights, and obligations to users.
Springer
springer.com
The policy provides a good foundation for data protection, but lacks transparency in data collection and usage, and has some weaknesses in user rights and control, liability terms, and dispute resolution procedures.
Encyclopedia Britannica
britannica.com
The policy provides a good foundation for data privacy and user rights, but could be improved by providing more comprehensive information on data collection and usage, data security measures, and user opt-out options.
Lexico
lexico.com
The policy provides a good foundation for protecting user data, but could be improved by providing clearer explanations of data retention, data security, user rights, and legal obligations.
Springer Nature
nature.com
The policy has significant weaknesses in data privacy and user rights categories, but provides clear information on liability terms and dispute resolution.