Privacy Policy Directory

Who What Wear

whowhatwear.com

70

The policies are comprehensive but could improve in clarity and specificity, particularly in security and legal terms.

Fansided

fansided.com

70

The policies have some strengths in data practices and clarity but fall short in user rights and legal fairness, warranting improvements for better user protection and transparency.

Lifehacker

lifehacker.com

70

Ziff Davis' privacy policy is comprehensive but has significant concerns regarding legal protections and clarity, scoring 70/100.

ShipStation

shipstation.com

70

The policy provides a good foundation for data protection, but could be improved by providing clear information on data retention, deletion, and data portability rights.

Baremetrics Inc

baremetrics.com

70

Baremetrics' policy and terms of service are generally clear and concise, but there are some areas for improvement, particularly in terms of data privacy and user rights.

Babycenter

babycenter.com

68

The policy is comprehensive but has notable issues with data sharing, legal terms, and clarity, scoring 68/100.

Built In

builtin.com

68

Built In's policies provide some transparency but fall short in user rights and legal fairness, with concerning arbitration clauses and broad data sharing.

Deadline

deadline.com

68

The policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data practices and legal protections, scoring 68 out of 100.

Facebook

facebook.com

68

Meta's policy is comprehensive but lacks clarity and has concerning legal elements.

GameRant.com (aka Game Rant)

gamerant.com

68

Valnet's policies are comprehensive but have clarity and user rights issues, scoring 68/100.

Kelley Blue Book

kbb.com

68

KBB's policies are thorough but lack in user protection and clarity, scoring 68/100 with notable weaknesses in legal fairness and data practices.

Marketingland

marketingland.com

68

MarTech's policies have some strengths but fall short in security, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 68/100.