Web Development Privacy Policies
Companies in the Web Development category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 65 companies in the Web Development category.
Prezi
prezi.com
Prezi's policy is robust in data protection and user rights but has critical issues in legal terms and clarity.
Radaris America Inc
radaris.com
Radaris' privacy policy and terms of service provide a solid foundation but have notable weaknesses in data privacy, user rights, and legal protection, which prevent it from being top-tier.
StudioPress
studiopress.com
WP Engine's policies provide a foundation for privacy and legal standards but fall short in transparency, user control, and clarity, particularly in security and liability terms.
Weebly
weebly.com
Square's privacy policy is comprehensive but has clarity and specificity issues, affecting user trust and understanding.
Wpastra
wpastra.com
Brainstorm Force's policies demonstrate strong security measures and clear user rights but fall short in data sharing transparency, retention clarity, and legal fairness, particularly for international users.
jQuery Project
jquery.com
The OpenJS Foundation's policies are clear but lack transparency in data handling and user rights.
IONOS
ionos.com
IONOS's policies are clear but lack some protections and clarity, scoring 72/100.
Catchthemes
catchthemes.com
Catch Themes has a decent privacy policy but lacks in data practices and user rights, scoring 65/100.
Themeisle
themeisle.com
ThemeIsle's privacy policy and terms of service provide a good foundation but lack specific details on data retention and user rights processes, and include concerning legal terms.
Prepostseo
prepostseo.com
Prepostseo.com's policies show strengths in security and user rights but have significant gaps in data practices and clarity, leading to a moderate overall score.
Youradchoices
youradchoices.com
The DAA's policies have some strengths but fall short in security, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 62/100.
Santoshdigital
santoshdigital.com
SantoshDigital's policies have some strengths but lack specific details in data security, user rights, and legal protections, leading to a moderate score of 62.