Technology Privacy Policies
Companies in the Technology industry Browse and analyze privacy policies from 282 companies in the Technology category.
Cleveland
cleveland.com
The policy provides a good overview of data collection and usage practices, but could be improved by providing more clarity and detail on user rights and legal protection.
Parallels
parallels.com
The policy has some strengths, but lacks clarity and specificity in certain areas, particularly regarding data retention periods and security measures.
Dribbble LLC
dribbble.com
The policy provides a clear explanation of the types of information collected and how it is used, but could be improved by providing a comprehensive list of all data types collected and explaining the purpose for each data type collected in detail.
AL.com
al.com
The policy provides a good overview of data collection and usage practices, but falls short in several areas, including data collection scope, sharing practices, and retention periods.
Hotmart
hotmart.com
Codecademy
codecademy.com
The policy provides some clear explanations of data collection and usage, user rights, and legal protection, but falls short in several areas, including data retention periods, user rights, and legal protection.
LG Electronics
lg.com
Personalized Beauty Discovery, Inc.
ipsy.com
The privacy notice is a good start, but it could be improved by providing a complete list of all data types collected and specific explanations of how data is used.
PicMonkey
picmonkey.com
The policy provides a good foundation for data protection, but falls short in terms of data retention periods and security measures.
Themuse
themuse.com
The policy provides a good starting point, but lacks clarity and transparency in certain areas.
Deadline
deadline.com
The policy provides a good foundation for data protection, but falls short in several areas, including data retention, data protection, and user rights.
Evernote
evernote.com
Evernote's privacy policy is comprehensive and well-organized, but they may retain data for longer than necessary and their data protection officer is not clearly identified.