Sports Coverage Privacy Policies
Companies in the Sports Coverage category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 37 companies in the Sports Coverage category.
Mundo Deportivo
mundodeportivo.com
Mundo Deportivo's policy excels in data practices and user rights but could improve in clarity and simplicity for better user understanding.
Wnba
wnba.com
The NBA's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing, retention transparency, and legal protections, scoring 82 out of 100.
Wtsp
wtsp.com
Google's Privacy Policy and Terms of Service are comprehensive and provide strong protections, but some areas like data sharing and legal terms could be more user-friendly.
FiveThirtyEight
fivethirtyeight.com
TWDC's policy excels in child protection and security but needs better clarity and user rights.
Globo - Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A.
globo.com
Globo's privacy policy is comprehensive in data handling but lacks clarity and detailed user controls, scoring 78/100.
MotoGP
motogp.com
DORNA's policies are strong in data practices and user rights but need improvement in clarity and legal fairness to meet ideal standards.
Autosport
autosport.com
A robust privacy policy with strong GDPR compliance and user rights, but with areas for improvement in clarity and dispute resolution.
ESPN
espn.com
Disney's policy is detailed but has significant issues with legal protections and clarity, scoring 75/100.
WITI - TV 6
fox6now.com
The policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in user rights and legal protections, particularly with mandatory arbitration and complex language.
IIHF
iihf.com
The IIHF's policies provide some privacy protections but lack clarity and specific user rights, with critical issues in data retention and legal terms.
Bleacher Report
bleacherreport.com
The policy and terms are comprehensive but have critical issues like mandatory arbitration and unclear data practices, affecting transparency and user rights.
Bet
bet.com
Paramount's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and user rights processes, while the terms of service raise concerns with mandatory arbitration.