Specialty Foods Privacy Policies
Companies in the Specialty Foods category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 28 companies in the Specialty Foods category.

Tropical Smoothie Cafe
tropicalsmoothiecafe.com
The policies are compliant with major regulations but need improvements in clarity, specificity, and user rights protection to achieve a higher score.

doTERRA International LLC
doterra.com
dōTERRA's policies are transparent in data practices but lack clarity in retention and sharing, with complex user rights processes and broad legal terms.

Food & Wine
foodandwine.com
The policy and terms are detailed but lack clarity and have one-sided legal terms, affecting user trust and understanding.

Food52
food52.com
Food52's policies have strengths in data practices but fall short in legal fairness and clarity, impacting user protections and understanding.

Lifeway
lifeway.com
Lifeway's policies are comprehensive but lack specificity in data practices and clarity, scoring 65/100.

Tigrinhobr
tigrinhobr.com
The policy outlines data practices and user rights but lacks clarity in security, retention, and dispute resolution, leading to a moderate score of 65.

Whole Foods Market
wholefoodsmarket.com
Whole Foods' privacy policy has strengths in opt-out mechanisms but falls short in data sharing transparency, security details, and user rights, scoring 65/100.

Ambitiouskitchen
ambitiouskitchen.com
Ambitious Kitchen's policy is transparent about data usage but lacks in security details and user protections.

Bbcgoodfood
bbcgoodfood.com
The policies have some strengths but lack clarity and detail in key areas, affecting user trust and compliance.

Lsuagcenter
lsuagcenter.com
The policy is clear on data usage and security but lacks transparency in data retention and user rights, scoring 62/100.

Youradchoices
youradchoices.com
The DAA's policies have some strengths but fall short in security, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 62/100.

Country Living
countryliving.com
Hearst's policy provides some transparency but has significant gaps in user protections, security, and legal fairness, scoring 62 out of 100.