Social Network Privacy Policies
Companies in the Social Network category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 67 companies in the Social Network category.
Qiita
qiita.com
Qiita's policy is comprehensive but has clarity and specificity issues, especially in data retention and sharing, affecting user trust and transparency.
facebook.com
Meta's policy is comprehensive but lacks clarity and has concerning legal elements.
Digg
digg.com
Digg's policies have strengths in user rights and transparency but fall short in security details and legal protections, leading to a moderate overall score.
Ellentube
ellentube.com
The policies have good transparency but lack in user protection and clarity.
LiveJournal
livejournal.com
LiveJournal's privacy policy is thorough but lacks clarity on user rights and relies on Russian jurisdiction, which may concern international users.
Myworld
myworld.com
MyWorld's policies have a solid foundation but lack transparency, user control, and clarity, scoring 65/100.
SnapWidget
snapwidget.com
SnapWidget's policies have strengths in transparency but lack specificity and clarity in key areas, leading to a moderate score of 65.
Tencent QQ
qq.com
腾讯的隐私政策在数据安全和未成年人保护方面表现良好，但在数据保留、用户控制和清晰度上有改进空间。
Panoramio
panoramio.com
Google's privacy policy and terms of service provide a moderate level of transparency and user control but lack specific details in key areas such as data retention, sharing practices, and dispute resolution, which are crucial for a top-tier privacy framework.
Meetup
meetup.com
Meetup's policies provide a foundation for privacy and user rights but fall short in transparency, user control, and legal fairness, particularly in arbitration clauses and data usage purposes.
Metafilter
metafilter.com
MetaFilter's policy is comprehensive but lacks in security details, data sharing, and user rights, scoring 62/100.
Sodahead
sodahead.com
The policy is comprehensive but raises concerns with broad data sharing and limited user rights, particularly through mandatory arbitration.