Social Network Privacy Policies

IntenseDebate

intensedebate.com

76

Automattic's policies are robust but lack clarity and balanced legal terms.

Dribbble LLC

dribbble.com

72

Dribbble's policy is comprehensive but has clarity and user control issues, scoring 72/100.

Facebook

fb.com

72

Meta's privacy policy is detailed but has notable weaknesses in data retention and sharing practices, affecting user control and clarity.

Rumble Automation Inc

rumble.com

72

Rumble's policies are comprehensive but suffer from complexity and some concerning legal terms, particularly the 50-year agency agreement and broad indemnification, which may not fully protect user interests.

Socialtimes

socialtimes.com

72

Adweek's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and user control, with restrictive legal terms.

StackOverflow

stackoverflow.com

72

Stack Overflow's policies are comprehensive but have critical issues like perpetual content licensing and mandatory arbitration, impacting user rights and fairness.

Untappd

untappd.com

72

Next Glass and Untappd's policies are comprehensive but have notable weaknesses in user rights and legal protections, particularly concerning arbitration and data sharing.

Viber

viber.com

72

Viber's privacy policy is comprehensive but has areas for improvement in clarity and user control.

WeChat

wechat.com

72

WeChat's privacy policy and terms of service provide a good foundation but fall short in user control and legal fairness, with critical issues in data sharing and dispute resolution.

Weheartit

weheartit.com

72

We Heart It's policies are detailed but lack in specific security measures and data minimization, with concerning legal clauses.

Wikia

wikia.com

72

Fandom's policies are strong in data practices but lack clarity and comprehensive user protections, scoring 72/100.

Joindeed

joindeed.com

72

Deed excels in data practices and user rights but needs improvement in legal fairness and clarity.