Research Platform Privacy Policies

Bepress

bepress.com

72

Elsevier's policy is transparent in data practices but lacks in user control and legal fairness, scoring 72/100.

Greentechmedia

greentechmedia.com

72

Greentech's policies are comprehensive but lack clarity and user control, scoring 72/100.

Oxford University Press

oup.com

72

Oxford University Press demonstrates strong security and user rights but lacks specific details in data practices and clarity.

Snopes

snopes.com

72

Snopes' policies are clear but have gaps in data practices and user rights.

Statista Inc.

statista.com

72

Statista's policies are comprehensive but lack transparency in data practices and user rights, with complex language affecting clarity.

Bioexplorer

bioexplorer.net

65

The policy is clear but lacks adequate security, user rights, and legal protections, scoring 65/100.

Explodingtopics

explodingtopics.com

65

ExplodingTopics.com's policies provide some privacy protections but have notable weaknesses in data handling and legal terms, impacting user trust and rights.

The Brookings Institution

brookings.edu

65

Brookings' policies have strengths in opt-out mechanisms and data security but lack transparency in data retention and user rights, with legal terms favoring the institution over users.

Factcheck

factcheck.org

62

FactCheck.org's policies have strengths in content reuse but fall short in data privacy transparency and user protections, with some one-sided legal clauses.

FreePatentsOnline

freepatentsonline.com

62

FreePatentsOnline.com has some strengths in data privacy but lacks in security, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 62/100.

Youradchoices

youradchoices.com

62

The DAA's policies have some strengths but fall short in security, user rights, and legal fairness, scoring 62/100.

Elsevier

elsevier.com

62

The policy provides a good explanation of data collection and usage, but lacks clarity in certain areas, such as data retention and user rights.