Recipe Website Privacy Policies
Companies in the Recipe Website category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 16 companies in the Recipe Website category.
Cond� Nast Publications
bonappetit.com
Condé Nast's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing and clarity.
Pinchofyum
pinchofyum.com
The policy is comprehensive with clear data practices and user rights but has concerns regarding retention, sharing, and dispute resolution.
Epicurious
epicurious.com
Condé Nast's privacy policy is comprehensive but has notable gaps in clarity, security, and user rights, scoring 78/100.
Hearst Communications
delish.com
Hearst's privacy policy and TOS are comprehensive but have areas for improvement in data retention transparency and user rights processes.
Just One Cookbook
justonecookbook.com
Just One Cookbook's policies are clear and comply with major regulations but have weaknesses in security, data sharing, and user rights.
Saveur
saveur.com
SAVEUR's policies are detailed but have critical issues like binding arbitration and broad data sharing, impacting user rights and legal protection.
Television Food Network, G.P.
foodnetwork.com
Warner Bros. Discovery's policies show some transparency but have significant gaps in data practices, user rights, and legal fairness, warranting a score of 68/100.
Food52
food52.com
Food52's policies have strengths in data practices but fall short in legal fairness and clarity, impacting user protections and understanding.
Print Friendly
printfriendly.com
The policy has strengths in data privacy and user rights but lacks clarity and specificity in key areas, leading to a moderate score of 65.
Ambitiouskitchen
ambitiouskitchen.com
Ambitious Kitchen's policy is transparent about data usage but lacks in security details and user protections.
Bbcgoodfood
bbcgoodfood.com
The policies have some strengths but lack clarity and detail in key areas, affecting user trust and compliance.
Eatthis
eatthis.com
EatThis.com's privacy policy and terms of service provide some user protections but have significant gaps in transparency, user control, and legal fairness.