Information Services Privacy Policies
Companies in the Information Services industry Browse and analyze privacy policies from 363 companies in the Information Services category.

History Today
historytoday.com
History Today Ltd. demonstrates strong data practices and user control but has weaknesses in security details and broad legal terms, scoring 80/100.

Iconfinder
iconfinder.com
Iconfinder's policies are comprehensive but lack transparency in data retention and security, with complex language that may hinder user understanding.

MedicineNet, Inc.
medicinenet.com
WebMD's policies are comprehensive but have gaps in user control and clarity.

Nielsen
nielsen.com
Nielsen's policies are comprehensive with strong privacy protections but lack in security details and retention clarity.

Payhip
payhip.com
Payhip's privacy policy and terms of service are comprehensive but have some gaps in clarity and user control, scoring 80/100.

The Boston Consulting Group
bcg.com
BCG's policies are robust but have areas for improvement in clarity, consent, and dispute resolution to enhance user trust and compliance.

WeWork
wework.com
WeWork's privacy policy and terms of service provide a comprehensive framework with strong data privacy and user rights, but have some gaps in security details and broad sharing practices.

Pipedrive
pipedrive.com
Pipedrive's policies are robust with strong privacy and legal protections but lack in clarity and user rights procedures.

Grindr
grindr.com
Grindr's policies provide comprehensive privacy measures but have concerning legal terms like mandatory arbitration.

UserTesting
usertesting.com
UserTesting's privacy policy and terms of service provide comprehensive data protection measures and clear user rights but lack transparency in security details and clarity in legal language, which may hinder user understanding.

Artfinder
artfinder.com
Artfinder's policies are comprehensive but lack clarity and specificity in key areas, impacting user control and understanding.

Backblaze, Inc.
backblaze.com
Backblaze demonstrates strong privacy practices with clear data handling and user rights, but lacks in security transparency and has restrictive legal terms.