Information Services Privacy Policies
Companies in the Information Services industry Browse and analyze privacy policies from 317 companies in the Information Services category.
EyeEm
eyeem.com
The EyeEm Privacy Policy and Terms of Service provide a good foundation for data protection and user rights, but there are some areas for improvement, particularly in terms of security measures and user control.
Pocket Casts
pocketcasts.com
The Pocket Casts Privacy Policy is generally clear and transparent about data collection and usage, but could improve by providing a complete list of all data types collected and clearer explanations of security measures.
Helpnetsecurity
helpnetsecurity.com
Help Net Security's privacy policy demonstrates a commitment to user privacy, but some areas require improvement, such as clear purpose for data collection and detailed deletion process.
Gallup
gallup.com
Gallup's privacy policy is generally clear and transparent, but could be improved by providing more detailed information on data security and retention, and more information on data subject rights under GDPR.
Litmus
litmus.com
Litmus' privacy policy and terms of service demonstrate a good understanding of data privacy practices, but there are areas for improvement in user rights and legal protection.
BrowserStack
browserstack.com
BrowserStack's privacy policy and terms of service demonstrate a good understanding of data protection principles, but there are areas for improvement in terms of clarity, user rights, and legal protection.
Discord
discordapp.com
Discord's data collection and usage practices are not transparent, and they do not provide users with clear control over their data. Their data retention policy is not clear, and it is unclear how long they retain user data.
Contagious
contagious.com
Ascential's privacy policy provides a good foundation for data protection, but lacks clarity in certain areas, such as data collection scope and deletion triggers.
Komoot
komoot.com
Komoot's data privacy policy and terms of service demonstrate a good understanding of user rights and data protection, but lack clarity and transparency in certain areas.
Wordfence
wordfence.com
Defiant's privacy policy provides a good balance between data protection and user rights, but there are areas for improvement, particularly in terms of security measures and user control.
WordPress.com
wordpress.com
The privacy policy provides a comprehensive explanation of data collection and usage practices, but could be improved by providing clear explanations of data retention period, data sharing with third parties, and data protection in case of a security breach.
Asana
asana.com
Asana's policy and terms of service demonstrate a commitment to data privacy and user rights, but there are areas for improvement in terms of clarity and comprehensiveness.