Information Services Privacy Policies
Companies in the Information Services industry Browse and analyze privacy policies from 363 companies in the Information Services category.
Scientific American
scientificamerican.com
Scientific American's policy is detailed but lacks clarity and user control, scoring 65/100.
Sky Sports
skysports.com
Sky's policy is comprehensive but lacks in user control and clarity, scoring 65/100.
Tabelog
tabelog.com
The policy provides some protections but has significant gaps in data privacy, user rights, and clarity, falling short of ideal standards.
TechSmith
techsmith.com
TechSmith's policy shows some strengths in GDPR compliance and cookie management but lacks detailed data practices and user rights, affecting overall transparency and user control.
Telecompaper
telecompaper.com
Telecompaper's policies are clear but lack depth in data privacy and user rights, with complex terms affecting transparency.
Tencent QQ
qq.com
腾讯的隐私政策在数据安全和未成年人保护方面表现良好，但在数据保留、用户控制和清晰度上有改进空间。
The Ashley Madison Agency Limited
madison.com
The policy provides detailed data practices but falls short in clarity and legal fairness, particularly due to mandatory arbitration and broad data sharing.
The Guardian
theguardian.com
The Guardian's Terms of Service are comprehensive but lack transparency in data practices and fall short in user control mechanisms, scoring 65 out of 100.
Theintercept
theintercept.com
The policy and terms provide a foundation but fall short in key areas like security, user rights, and fairness, with critical issues in data handling and legal protections.
Travel + Leisure
travelandleisure.com
The policy provides detailed data practices but lacks clarity and has broad legal terms, scoring 65 out of 100.
Tutsplus
tutsplus.com
Envato Tuts+ has a structured policy but lacks in security and data disclosure, affecting user trust and compliance.
Typeform S.L
typeform.com
The policy has some strengths but falls short in clarity, user rights, and legal protections, scoring 65 out of 100.