Graphic Design Privacy Policies
Companies in the Graphic Design category Browse and analyze privacy policies from 15 companies in the Graphic Design category.
Flaticon
flaticon.com
Freepik's policies are robust in data security and legal compliance but could improve in user rights clarity and legal fairness.
PicMonkey
picmonkey.com
PicMonkey's policy is clear and protects user rights well but has gaps in data sharing and security.
Rawpixel
rawpixel.com
Rawpixel's policy excels in security and user rights but needs improvement in data retention transparency and consent options.
Iconfinder
iconfinder.com
Iconfinder's policies are comprehensive but lack transparency in data retention and security, with complex language that may hinder user understanding.
Emaze
emaze.com
Emaze's policies are comprehensive but have notable gaps in data retention and legal fairness, scoring 78/100.
TrooMobile
slides.com
Slides excels in data privacy and user rights but needs improvement in transparency and legal fairness.
Logos
logos.com
Logos demonstrates strong data privacy practices with clear transparency but has weaknesses in data retention and sharing. User rights are robust, especially under GDPR, but legal protections and clarity could be improved.
Fontsinuse
fontsinuse.com
Fonts In Use excels in data privacy and clarity but needs improvements in user rights and legal protections to achieve a top score.
Free Images
freeimages.com
Freeimages.com's policies are comprehensive but have gaps in transparency and user control, scoring 72/100.
Smore
smore.com
Smore excels in data privacy and user control but lacks in clarity and legal protection, especially in dispute resolution and data retention transparency.
Dafont
dafont.com
The policy is clear and protects data well but lacks detailed security, user rights, and legal protections.
Pngtree
pngtree.com
Pngtree's policies have some strengths but fall short in key areas like data sharing, security, and user rights, impacting overall transparency and user protection.