Educational Resource Privacy Policies

Instructure

instructure.com

72

Instructure's policies are transparent but lack specificity in security and retention, impacting user trust and compliance.

Linuxjournal

linuxjournal.com

72

Slashdot Media's privacy policy is comprehensive but lacks transparency in security and clarity, scoring 72/100.

Manning

manning.com

72

Manning's privacy policy is clear and provides good user controls but lacks in security details and has broad data sharing practices.

MarketingProfs

marketingprofs.com

72

MarketingProfs has a solid privacy policy with clear data practices but falls short in legal fairness and clarity.

Mental Floss

mentalfloss.com

72

The policy is transparent but has vague retention periods and broad sharing practices, with one-sided legal terms and complex user rights processes.

Nearpod

nearpod.com

72

Nearpod's privacy policy and terms of service provide good transparency in data collection and use but lack in specific security details and user control mechanisms.

Oxford University Press

oup.com

72

Oxford University Press demonstrates strong security and user rights but lacks specific details in data practices and clarity.

Penzu Inc

penzu.com

72

Penzu's policies are strong on data privacy and user rights but lack clarity and comprehensiveness, scoring 72/100.

Pluralsight

pluralsight.com

72

Pluralsight's Terms are comprehensive but have clarity and user rights issues, scoring 72/100.

Scholastic

scholastic.com

72

Scholastic's privacy policy and terms of service provide a robust framework with strong user rights and clear explanations, but fall short in areas like data sharing transparency and security details.

Smore

smore.com

72

Smore excels in data privacy and user control but lacks in clarity and legal protection, especially in dispute resolution and data retention transparency.

Interestingengineering

interestingengineering.com

72

IE Media's policies are clear but have gaps in data privacy and user rights, scoring 72/100.