Digital Publishing Privacy Policies

Ereleases

ereleases.com

72

eReleases demonstrates a solid approach to privacy and legal standards but has areas for improvement in clarity, specificity, and user protections.

Penske Media Corporation

pmc.com

72

PMC's policy is comprehensive but has notable weaknesses in data sharing, security, and legal protections, impacting user rights and clarity.

Radaris America Inc

radaris.com

72

Radaris' privacy policy and terms of service provide a solid foundation but have notable weaknesses in data privacy, user rights, and legal protection, which prevent it from being top-tier.

StudioPress

studiopress.com

72

WP Engine's policies provide a foundation for privacy and legal standards but fall short in transparency, user control, and clarity, particularly in security and liability terms.

Artforum

artforum.com

65

PMC's privacy practices are comprehensive but raise concerns with broad data collection and legal clauses that may disadvantage users.

Designboom

designboom.com

65

DAAily's policy excels in international data transfers but falls short in data sharing transparency, security details, and legal fairness, scoring 65/100.

Shortform

shortform.com

65

Shortform's policies have strengths in data privacy but lack in user control and clarity, scoring 65/100.

SnapWidget

snapwidget.com

65

SnapWidget's policies have strengths in transparency but lack specificity and clarity in key areas, leading to a moderate score of 65.

Heyzine

heyzine.com

62

Heyzine's policies show good GDPR compliance but have significant gaps in user rights, security details, and legal fairness, making them less protective than ideal.

Priceonomics

priceonomics.com

62

Content Tracker has good data privacy practices but lacks in user control and legal fairness.

Waitbutwhy

waitbutwhy.com

62

The policy is transparent about data practices but lacks specificity in retention and sharing, with legal terms favoring the company over users.